rogerdw Guru Joined: 22/10/2019 Location: AustraliaPosts: 955
Posted: 05:23am 11 Apr 2021
You are quite right in that they do normally harvest the heat from the tube with a "heat pipe" ... but my 'cheap' pipes don't have them fitted so my experiments revolved around just the bare tubes.
The heat I was obtaining still seemed very worthwhile even without them, so I was trying to avoid the expense and complication of buying or making them.
That's a good description, they do look like giant long skinny test tubes ... though they have a second tube inside the outer one ... with a vacuum inbetween ... like a good old thermos flask. The inner one has a black coating that absorbs the suns energy ... which cannot escape due to the vacuum between the tubes.
The overall OD is ~60mm and ID is 44mm.
Thanks for that Dave, I can never work out the pros and cons of all the different types.
The fan I used pushing air down the C-Section does the job ok though it's not super speed or volume ... just a nice continuous waft of warm air coming out from under the bench.
It may have been better having a fan at the bottom pulling air down ... but I wanted the noise further away!
Sounds like a good find Dave, it's obviously horses for courses ... though 17A is a bit of a jump up from 2A. Depends how often it has to run in your burner I suppose.
Yes, that's a great idea if I can find a blower (or sucker) fan that will work on DC happily. Move the air easiest when the sun is strongest.
I had sort of taken PVC and plastics off the list and was contemplating a timber or composite structure for the manifolds and housing. Not really sure yet but I could certainly see plastic turning into a floppy mess.
Yes, that's one of the touted benefits in the sales pages for the tubes and means they are no where near as fussy as eg pv panels.
I'll keep you up to date ... just gotta keep some momentum.