Author |
Message |
Revlac
Guru
Joined: 31/12/2016 Location: AustraliaPosts: 1004 |
Posted: 07:53am 17 Jan 2023 |
|
|
|
I have been testing this for the last few days and taken short video clips so I can check it again and the numbers are the same, not surprised if the meters are a little out.
I have an old (2015 model) PIP 4048HS (Voltronic) inverter in the shed and the also the home built inverter, from the "Another Inverter Build" thread.
Its well known the idle consumption of 50w on these (used to be low cost) HF type inverter's is horrible on the 48v version. So decided to see if it still holds true under load. Idle at 54v =50w, this is not shown on the inverter display but a clamp meter will see the 1Amp from the battery, I Turn a heater on, that makes a 31A load at battery and display (confirmed with clamp meter), display watts 1.52kw out, battery volts 52.4, battery consumption 1624w = 100w loss.
Now the heater is at the end of the cable, perhaps 60m away, I connected a power meter close to the heater and it was reading 220vac 1480w so a loss of 40w, there is some power loss in this length of cable I can tell because it will warm up a little over time.
The home built inverter had 26w Idle consumption, ideal for standby and occasional Heavy motor starts, hands down beats the PIP 4048HS inverter in this situation for shed use, that's why I built it.
But The PIP 4048HS inverter might be a more efficient with loads of 500w to 1500w orso. I might be building another inverter for the house with Peak efficiency between 300w to 1500w as thats where most of the loads are.
Anyone else have some different Peak Efficiency figures? Cheers Aaron Off The Grid |
|
nickskethisniks Guru
Joined: 17/10/2017 Location: BelgiumPosts: 449 |
Posted: 09:56pm 26 Jan 2023 |
|
|
|
Aaron, I did some rough testing on my ozz inverter a few weeks ago, this were the numbers I noted, testing was done with especially resistive loads: I had 4 meters at hand, 3 uni-T true RMS meters (current clamp type) and 1 extech true rms voltage meter.
The AC meter is a chinese front panel meter and is actually accurate.
Measurement 1: on my AC meter 328W with my clamp meter: 2.2A 237VAC --> 521.4VA 8.0A 52.1V --> 417W
With this power level there is a substantial part reactive power I guess, all switched power supplies with a bad power factor so it seems?
328/417W -->78%
Measurement 2: on my AC meter 1335W
with my clamp meter: 5.92A 238VAC --> 1409VA 28.3A 51.85VDC --> 1468W
1335/1468 => 90.9%
Measurement 3 on my AC meter 2340W on my clamp meter: 10A 239.5VAC --> 2395VA 48.6A 51.3VDC --> 2493.18W
2340/2493 => 93.8%
Measurement 4
On my AC meter 3765W with my clamp meter: 15.8A 238.8V AC --> 3773VA 82.2A 49.7V --> 4085W 3765/4085 =>92.2%
Measurement 5:
on my AC meter 6122W with my clamp meter 27.2A 224V AC --> 6160VA 142A 48.5V --> 6887W 6122/6887 => 89%
My inverter is completely powering my house, so it's a real life example. I have some difficulties how I best calculate the efficiency of the inverter because of the reactive power involved. But I did with the worsted scenario. But either way it looks like my inverter has the highest efficiency around the 2500W mark.
The dropping of the voltage with higher loads has to do with the long cable run between inverter and battery. To be improved. I don't think I can improve more, just maybe the filter inductor between H-bridge and transformer, it gets hot, it only has 30mm˛ wire I think |
|
Revlac
Guru
Joined: 31/12/2016 Location: AustraliaPosts: 1004 |
Posted: 09:58am 28 Jan 2023 |
|
|
|
Thanks Nicks, that looks great. Its interesting how it works out, the bigger loads are much better and inline with what I have been told when I started my build. I see Measurement 1: at 78% would be mostly inductive loads, and Measurement 3: is doing very well at 93.8%
Looking through some of my notes and photos from previous test runs, this is the Mad Inverter running in the shed, it has a C core type transformer, so not as good as a Toroidal transformer but still quite capable. Some loads, measured at AC output and power used from battery. 137w ac 177w =77%
500w ac 626w =79%
1656w ac 1824w =90%
2022w ac 2245w =90% Running a kettle to make a cup of coffee....
500 watts and lower, the efficiency gets clobbered, most of the house loads are within the 100w -500w range and running most of the time over night, large Fridge and a Deep freezer, and many other little things. Not sure if I can improve on the lower wattage loads....will do some more testing in the future. |
|
nickskethisniks Guru
Joined: 17/10/2017 Location: BelgiumPosts: 449 |
Posted: 08:38am 15 Feb 2023 |
|
|
|
I would look in to devices with bad power factor, improving this Will improve your efficiency. The quality of the series choke is important too. Warpspeed or wiseguy warned me about a too big airgap in my choke. And I think I noticed a higher loss then I calculated. You get something like fringing close to the Gap.wich eventually increase losses in the choke. Even with low load I notice a warm choke which is probably caused by circulating currents. |
|