Notice. New forum software under development. It's going to miss a few functions and look a bit ugly for a while, but I'm working on it full time now as the old forum was too unstable. Couple days, all good. If you notice any issues, please contact me.
Has anyone tried the Pico running a touchscreen (backpack)? I am wondering how the speed interacting with the touchscreen compares to the touchscreen on a Micromite? (which is quick) There was a suggestion in Silicon Chip magazine that the Pico (and the Pico W more so) are not that quick on screen ops using MicroPython. Would MMbasic be faster? or would the Pico be struggling to keep up anyway? Thank you. Peter
matherp Guru Joined: 11/12/2012 Location: United KingdomPosts: 10636
Posted: 01:02pm 09 Aug 2023
Copy link to clipboard
Print this post
The Pico is faster but both are much faster than "human" time
Thank you maltherp, Wow, that is awesome. What makes it faster than the earlier Micromites? I am thinking of the Explore 100 and the smaller units which were pretty snappy.I recall the article mentioned that the original Micropython was slow. What makes MMbasic much faster?
matherp Guru Joined: 11/12/2012 Location: United KingdomPosts: 10636
Posted: 01:50pm 09 Aug 2023
Copy link to clipboard
Print this post
Probably about the same as the explore 100, faster than a MX170.
There is nothing clever about the touch handling. If touch is enabled then at the end of every statement MMBasic reads the touch interrupt pin. If that has changed then it processes accordingly