Home
JAQForum Ver 24.01
Log In or Join  
Active Topics
Local Time 14:25 06 Nov 2025 Privacy Policy
Jump to

Notice. New forum software under development. It's going to miss a few functions and look a bit ugly for a while, but I'm working on it full time now as the old forum was too unstable. Couple days, all good. If you notice any issues, please contact me.

Forum Index : Microcontroller and PC projects : AI research project for this month

     Page 11 of 11    
Author Message
PhenixRising
Guru

Joined: 07/11/2023
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1623
Posted: 11:48pm 04 Nov 2025
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

JohnS

What thermodynamics?

Did you bypass all the above?

You are still hung up on Faraday from almost 200 years ago.

I mean gimme a break.

"Oh Mike's discovery consumes too much energy, let's go out in the ocean and drill through ten feet of granite to get to those fossils (don't ask how the fossils ended up on the other side of the granite) and let's pump this stuff, refine it and sell it at a huge profit and polute every damn thing"

Yeah better than people using water, right?
 
JohnS
Guru

Joined: 18/11/2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4121
Posted: 11:51pm 04 Nov 2025
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  PhenixRising said  JohnS

What thermodynamics?

Did you bypass all the above?

You are still hung up on Faraday from almost 200 years ago.

I mean gimme a break.

"Oh Mike's discovery consumes too much energy, let's go out in the ocean and drill through ten feet of granite to get to those fossils (don't ask how the fossils ended up on the other side of the granite) and let's pump this stuff, refine it and sell it at a huge profit and polute every damn thing"

Yeah better than people using water, right?

I'm sticking to your claims about water and H2 & O2.

You're avoiding backing up what you claimed with appropriate facts.

John
 
lizby
Guru

Joined: 17/05/2016
Location: United States
Posts: 3464
Posted: 12:17am 05 Nov 2025
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  PhenixRising said  Who coined the term "fossil fuel"?

JD Rockefeller  


Per Wikipedia, "The first recorded use of the term "fossil fuel" occurs in the work of the German chemist Caspar Neumann, in English translation in 1759."

A similar rigor in the introduction of "facts" seems prevalent.
PicoMite, Armmite F4, SensorKits, MMBasic Hardware, Games, etc. on fruitoftheshed
 
PhenixRising
Guru

Joined: 07/11/2023
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1623
Posted: 12:22am 05 Nov 2025
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

I'm avoiding nothing. You clearly haven't watched the videos I linked.

Even British investigators visit Stan Meyer and found nothing but water power.

If you care to investigate this topic, you will find many who have replicated this technology and have died mysteriously with all records removed.

There's no hope for those who swallow the mainstream horse doo-doo.
 
PhenixRising
Guru

Joined: 07/11/2023
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1623
Posted: 12:37am 05 Nov 2025
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  lizby said  
  PhenixRising said  Who coined the term "fossil fuel"?

JD Rockefeller  


Per Wikipedia, "The first recorded use of the term "fossil fuel" occurs in the work of the German chemist Caspar Neumann, in English translation in 1759."

A similar rigor in the introduction of "facts" seems prevalent.


Expand your research to who OWNS Wikipedia. Their constant pleas for donations?

Do you have any idea how much they are sitting on?

Obviously you don't. Just go along with the BS.

I was recently asked to perform at a gig for Christies Cancer Charity.
I researched their financials:

2023:
Total received £24M
Total paid out to the cause:£1.6M

Remainder: For future purposes

People are total suckers who believe any damn thing.

And here we are. Only believe what we are told.

Sad, sad, sad.
 
lizby
Guru

Joined: 17/05/2016
Location: United States
Posts: 3464
Posted: 01:02am 05 Nov 2025
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  PhenixRising said  Sad, sad, sad.


You don't say that Wikipedia is wrong, and you don't provide any evidence that what you claim about Rockefeller is right.

Per perplexity.ai:
  Quote  Multiple reliable sources debunk myths and conspiracy claims that Rockefeller invented the term "fossil fuel" to manipulate perceptions or oil prices. Instead, the phrase gradually became more common in the early 20th century to describe coal, oil, and natural gas derived from ancient organic material.

Summary from credible sources:

The phrase "fossil fuel" dates to mid-18th century scientific works.

Rockefeller did not coin or use the term in business or public discourse.

Scientific consensus confirms fossil fuels derive from prehistoric organic matter.

Claims linking Rockefeller to inventing this term to induce scarcity are false.


I am mindful of what Harm said: "You cannot convince them, stop trying."
PicoMite, Armmite F4, SensorKits, MMBasic Hardware, Games, etc. on fruitoftheshed
 
PhenixRising
Guru

Joined: 07/11/2023
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1623
Posted: 01:14am 05 Nov 2025
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

To keep one's head in the sand is one's prerogative.

I choose not to because I think critically and disposed of the TV after that ridiculous faked 9/11 garbage.
 
PhenixRising
Guru

Joined: 07/11/2023
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1623
Posted: 01:43am 05 Nov 2025
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

So I'm throwing down the gauntlet.
It's basic stuff.

All you guys opposing me:

The portion of the wing tip that sliced through steel reinforced concrete.

How did the hollow aluminium section achieve this hot-knife-through-butter penetration? The calcs are pretty simple
....so enlighten me.

Volhout?
Mixtel90?
Twofingers?
Lizby?
Phill99?
JohnS

You are all ready to respond but with
NOTHING....except go with the government narrative. Grow a pair and give me a real answer.

Not gonna happen, because you will never make the numbers work  
 
Revlac

Guru

Joined: 31/12/2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 1202
Posted: 02:19am 05 Nov 2025
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  Quote  he portion of the wing tip that sliced through steel reinforced concrete.

How did the hollow aluminium section achieve this hot-knife-through-butter penetration


Destructive Power of Plastic at Orbital Speeds. See NASA Experiment
Chicken cannon....Fun but impacts are devastating
wooden post fired at high speed goes through brick wall.
PinPong ball fired at high velocity...seen on Mythbuster's.

I don't care for all the numbers or science.
Most of us are aware of Kinetic energy  

@PhenixRising Take a break Mate! Have cuppa Tea or coffee.
Cheers Aaron
Off The Grid
 
Revlac

Guru

Joined: 31/12/2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 1202
Posted: 02:25am 05 Nov 2025
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

Ok I think the conversation was back on page 8?

I'm sure a lot of solar panels would be replaced several times before the net zero targets, along with inverters and associated parts.
Perhaps AI can add that up.
Cheers Aaron
Off The Grid
 
lizby
Guru

Joined: 17/05/2016
Location: United States
Posts: 3464
Posted: 03:17am 05 Nov 2025
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  Revlac said  I'm sure a lot of solar panels would be replaced several times before the net zero targets, along with inverters and associated parts.
Perhaps AI can add that up.


And so? Here's a human: TED talk. tl;dr: clean tech through 2050 needs 230 million tons extracted annually; compared to an annual harvest of 8 billion tons of coal, 5 billion tons of oil, 3 billion tons natural gas.
PicoMite, Armmite F4, SensorKits, MMBasic Hardware, Games, etc. on fruitoftheshed
 
JohnS
Guru

Joined: 18/11/2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4121
Posted: 07:42am 05 Nov 2025
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  PhenixRising said  So I'm throwing down the gauntlet.
It's basic stuff.

JohnS

You are all ready to respond but with
NOTHING....except go with the government narrative. Grow a pair and give me a real answer.

Not gonna happen, because you will never make the numbers work  

I am sticking to the water / H2 / O2 stuff.

I doubt I know anything like enough to divert per your above item nor do I have any interest in it.

But - I _am_ interested in getting you to admit that Meyer etc is bunkum.  You just cannot be wrong, can you.

However, I think you've ruined this thread and that's a pity.

John
Edited 2025-11-05 17:44 by JohnS
 
lizby
Guru

Joined: 17/05/2016
Location: United States
Posts: 3464
Posted: 06:16pm 05 Nov 2025
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  JohnS said  However, I think you've ruined this thread


Perhaps all is not lost. This makes for a case study of several well understood argumentation maladies.

1) The Gish Gallop: "During a typical Gish gallop, the galloper confronts an opponent with a rapid series of specious arguments, half-truths, misrepresentations"

So here we have the galloping (not pertinent to the thread) hobbyhorses:

 A) Miracle electrolysis: "Stan Meyer discovered that using high AC voltage at a specific frequency, negligible current, could achieve spectacular hydrogen production".

 B) 9/11 conspiracism: "how the wing-tips sliced through steel reinforced concrete"

 C) Covid denialism: "no myocarditis, pericarditis, turbo cancers" (Although I guess I haven't kept up--this one seems backwards--those of us who did get vaccines were supposed to be getting those, not those who "didn't roll up our sleeves".)

We know Phenix has additional hobbyhorses in his stable--let's just hope they don't get trotted out.

2) Brandolini's Law: "The amount of energy needed to refute bullsh*t is an order of magnitude bigger than that needed to produce it."

Maybe we should also consider Hitchens's Razor: "What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence."
PicoMite, Armmite F4, SensorKits, MMBasic Hardware, Games, etc. on fruitoftheshed
 
Mixtel90

Guru

Joined: 05/10/2019
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 8267
Posted: 07:09pm 05 Nov 2025
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

Stan Meyer's wonderful water cell was eventually inspected (in spite of him keeping putting off the inspectors in various ways). It was found to be nothing but ordinary electrolysis. He was convicted of fraudulently obtaining money from investors and had to refund the £25,000. He never had anything even resembling what he boasted about.

If water-powered engines are possible and have actually been made then someone definitely must be able to provide verifiable proof of it. I challenge *anyone* to provide such proof. Note that internet sources are NOT proof as the internet is guaranteed to be 90% lies because 90% of the contributors are liars in one way or another. :)  Just saying "the big corporations are crushing the invention" is as much a get-out as saying "It's in the Bible/Daily Express/Koran/Facebook etc. so it has to be true".

The burden of proof is on those who say a thing is possible. It's impossible for someone to prove the opposite as the supporters of the theory will continue moving the goalposts indefinitely to suit their own argument.

Engineering: Have you never used a sanding disk on metal? Sand isn't all that abrasive really and mild steel sheet is much harder, yet a sanding disk will quite happily round off corners of a sheet simply because what friction there is is combined with a very high speed and a little pressure, both of which increase the abrasive effect by a large amount. Too much pressure and the disk tears - it's relatively fragile. Very much like the seemingly fragile tip of an aircraft propeller.
.
Edited 2025-11-06 05:14 by Mixtel90
Mick

Zilog Inside! nascom.info for Nascom & Gemini
Preliminary MMBasic docs & my PCB designs
 
twofingers

Guru

Joined: 02/06/2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 1666
Posted: 07:16pm 05 Nov 2025
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

@Lance,
  Quote  Maybe we should also consider Hitchens's Razor: "What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence."

I wasn't familiar with that before. Thanks!
I only knew "Occam's razor" and Sagan's "principle that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence". And beware of the "firehose of falsehoods."
Kind regards
Michael
causality ≠ correlation ≠ coincidence
 
Mixtel90

Guru

Joined: 05/10/2019
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 8267
Posted: 07:34pm 05 Nov 2025
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

@JohnS
I don't know the workings of this particular forum software, but I do know that on at least two others it's possible to rescue any thread simply by creating a new, empty one and moving a load of posts into it. This I know 'cos I've done it myself several times. :) Who can do it depends on the moderation permissions that have been set by an admin (being one of those pointy hat beings on two other fora I can also speak with some authority on this). At that level you can also simply delete unwelcome posts but it can make you a bit unpopular sometimes (ask me how I know... <hehe>).
Mick

Zilog Inside! nascom.info for Nascom & Gemini
Preliminary MMBasic docs & my PCB designs
 
JohnS
Guru

Joined: 18/11/2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4121
Posted: 08:51pm 05 Nov 2025
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

Some great references & quotes above - thanks all.

John
 
Gizmo

Admin Group

Joined: 05/06/2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 5153
Posted: 11:54pm 05 Nov 2025
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

OK going to lock the thread, its getting a bit off subject and had a couple complaints.

Glenn
The best time to plant a tree was twenty years ago, the second best time is right now.
JAQ
 
     Page 11 of 11    
Print this page


To reply to this topic, you need to log in.

The Back Shed's forum code is written, and hosted, in Australia.
© JAQ Software 2025