Home
JAQForum Ver 24.01
Log In or Join  
Active Topics
Local Time 17:54 01 Aug 2026 Privacy Policy
Jump to

Notice. New forum software under development. It's going to miss a few functions and look a bit ugly for a while, but I'm working on it full time now as the old forum was too unstable. Couple days, all good. If you notice any issues, please contact me.

Forum Index : Microcontroller and PC projects : Getting a PICOCalc what is the best PICO to use  W of no W?

Author Message
mclout999

Guru

Joined: 05/07/2020
Location: United States
Posts: 512
Posted: 08:45pm 30 Jul 2026
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

Hi, my brother just ordered a picocalc for me so I Only have to wait in eternity before it gets here. I would like to play around with the Wi-fi. And Bluetooth. But are there any drawbacks? When using the pico calc. I have both. Pico2s and Pico 2 Ws.   What are the benefits? And drawbacks of using a Pick a 2W In the PicoCalc?  Don't rush. The eons I'll have to wait before. The thing gets here. Allow for. Any amount of conversation. Damn, 60 days is what they say, so it probably means 120.
They call me Shai-Hulud (The maker)
 
lizby
Guru

Joined: 17/05/2016
Location: United States
Posts: 3838
Posted: 09:15pm 30 Jul 2026
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

Kind of niche at present, it seems, but if you have the "W", you can get Claude Code (or Gemini) to talk to it over telnet while you watch or even intervene on serial. Or vice versa.

I avoided the "W' for a long time (early reports of instability), but now it's what I want to have.
PicoMite, Armmite F4, SensorKits, MMBasic Hardware, Games, etc. on FOTS
 
matherp
Guru

Joined: 11/12/2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 11687
Posted: 10:21am 31 Jul 2026
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

Get a Pimoroni Plus 2 W, best of all options
 
toml_12953
Guru

Joined: 13/02/2015
Location: United States
Posts: 691
Posted: 10:34am 31 Jul 2026
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  mclout999 said  Hi, my brother just ordered a picocalc for me so I Only have to wait in eternity before it gets here. I would like to play around with the Wi-fi. And Bluetooth. But are there any drawbacks? When using the pico calc. I have both. Pico2s and Pico 2 Ws.   What are the benefits? And drawbacks of using a Pick a 2W In the PicoCalc?  Don't rush. The eons I'll have to wait before. The thing gets here. Allow for. Any amount of conversation. Damn, 60 days is what they say, so it probably means 120.


Get a Pimoroni Pico 2W then you can try both the Web version and non-Web version of MMBasic. I prefer the non-Web version since, when you don't use WiFi, you can run at a higher clock speed. Also, you get access to turtle graphics and have more free memory than with the Web version. I have a battery-backed RTC so I don't need the time server access and I don't act as a server or use any of the Web functions so that's wasted on me. I do miss being able to use Telnet to run the PicoCalc wirelessly but really enjoy the higher clock speed.

Which should you choose? I'd get the Pimoroni Pico 2W. then you can load both versions of MMBasic (one at a time, of course) and decide which is better for you.
 
mclout999

Guru

Joined: 05/07/2020
Location: United States
Posts: 512
Posted: 09:24pm 31 Jul 2026
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  toml_12953 said  
  mclout999 said  Hi, my brother just ordered a picocalc for me so I Only have to wait in eternity before it gets here. I would like to play around with the Wi-fi. And Bluetooth. But are there any drawbacks? When using the pico calc. I have both. Pico2s and Pico 2 Ws.   What are the benefits? And drawbacks of using a Pick a 2W In the PicoCalc?  Don't rush. The eons I'll have to wait before. The thing gets here. Allow for. Any amount of conversation. Damn, 60 days is what they say, so it probably means 120.


Get a Pimoroni Pico 2W then you can try both the Web version and non-Web version of MMBasic. I prefer the non-Web version since, when you don't use WiFi, you can run at a higher clock speed. Also, you get access to turtle graphics and have more free memory than with the Web version. I have a battery-backed RTC so I don't need the time server access and I don't act as a server or use any of the Web functions so that's wasted on me. I do miss being able to use Telnet to run the PicoCalc wirelessly but really enjoy the higher clock speed.

Which should you choose? I'd get the Pimoroni Pico 2W. then you can load both versions of MMBasic (one at a time, of course) and decide which is better for you.


Thanks, that's the information I've been looking for. A comparison and contrast. I think the non-web version is the best then. I have Plenty of Pico 2s.
They call me Shai-Hulud (The maker)
 
Mixtel90

Guru

Joined: 05/10/2019
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 8995
Posted: 06:48am 01 Aug 2026
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

Obviously you can't "play around with the Wi-fi. And Bluetooth" unless you get the W version - and it doesn't cost *that* much more....   ;)
Mick

Zilog Inside! nascom.info for Nascom & Gemini
Preliminary MMBasic docs & my PCB designs
 
Print this page


To reply to this topic, you need to log in.

The Back Shed's forum code is written, and hosted, in Australia.
© JAQ Software 2026