Home
JAQForum Ver 20.06
Log In or Join  
Active Topics
Local Time 06:33 06 May 2024 Privacy Policy
Jump to

Notice. New forum software under development. It's going to miss a few functions and look a bit ugly for a while, but I'm working on it full time now as the old forum was too unstable. Couple days, all good. If you notice any issues, please contact me.

Forum Index : Microcontroller and PC projects : 72 Mhz pic32mx170 28 pin

Author Message
isochronic
Guru

Joined: 21/01/2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 689
Posted: 05:27pm 25 Jun 2017
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

A faster '170 : [soic, no sdip though]

pic32mx174
 
Grogster

Admin Group

Joined: 31/12/2012
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 9066
Posted: 12:28am 26 Jun 2017
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

Interesting......

IF this chip was worthy of pick-up by Geoff and Peter, it would be a drop-in replacement for the standard SOIC 170 chip on the Explore-28 module.
Smoke makes things work. When the smoke gets out, it stops!
 
CaptainBoing

Guru

Joined: 07/09/2016
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1985
Posted: 01:10am 26 Jun 2017
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

oooh! Nice!

The 17x is still a very capable device and ideal for smaller installations.

I use loads of them with HC12s in wireless networks for things as diverse as snooker table light control, beer-barrel sterilization and customer feedback pods. They all use encryption on their traffic and I recently had to write a simple rolling encryption routine because the stock 170 struggled to keep up on throughput of longer RC4 encrypted strings in rapid succession. I have shied away from converting an MD5 routine I have (not deprecated like RC4) for the same reason.

The 50% extra grunt would immediately allow me to harden the radio chatter.

hopeful Edited by CaptainBoing 2017-06-27
 
Geoffg

Guru

Joined: 06/06/2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 3165
Posted: 02:59am 26 Jun 2017
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

I have have been experimenting with the MX174 as an advanced Micromite and unfortunately it is not a straight drop in replacement for the MX170. However I am hoping to get the firmware to dynamically switch between the two chips.

Watch this space.

Geoff
Geoff Graham - http://geoffg.net
 
WhiteWizzard
Guru

Joined: 05/04/2013
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2794
Posted: 07:18am 26 Jun 2017
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  Geoffg said   However I am hoping to get the firmware to dynamically switch between the two chips.

Watch this space.


For everything Micromite visit micromite.org

Direct Email: whitewizzard@micromite.o
 
WhiteWizzard
Guru

Joined: 05/04/2013
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2794
Posted: 07:23am 26 Jun 2017
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

Where can you get the 174's from? I can't see the DIP anywhere??
For everything Micromite visit micromite.org

Direct Email: whitewizzard@micromite.o
 
twofingers
Guru

Joined: 02/06/2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 1133
Posted: 08:08am 26 Jun 2017
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  WhiteWizzard said   Where can you get the 174's from? I can't see the DIP anywhere??


There are no DIPs!

Michael
 
WhiteWizzard
Guru

Joined: 05/04/2013
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2794
Posted: 08:14am 26 Jun 2017
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  twofingers said  There are no DIPs!


At least that explains why I can't find any!!!


For everything Micromite visit micromite.org

Direct Email: whitewizzard@micromite.o
 
matherp
Guru

Joined: 11/12/2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 8592
Posted: 08:32am 26 Jun 2017
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  Quote  I have have been experimenting with the MX174 as an advanced Micromite


Geoff, I assume you have seen the extensive errata

In particular, note that the CLK0 pin is an output on power up regardless of config so this pin isn't safe to have connected without a current limiting resistor.

I also really like this one (NOT!!!)

  Quote  The user application must not attempt to enter Deep Sleep
mode for a period of 50 µs after exiting Reset on start-up or the
device will never recover and is no longer able to be erased
and/or reprogrammed.


This one is also dangerous if programming a part in circuit
  Quote  Hardware automatically configures and enables the TDO
output pin function, which toggles when any PGECx/PGEDx
pair are used during programming

Edited by matherp 2017-06-27
 
Print this page


To reply to this topic, you need to log in.

© JAQ Software 2024