Home
JAQForum Ver 20.06
Log In or Join  
Active Topics
Local Time 12:09 19 Apr 2024 Privacy Policy
Jump to

Notice. New forum software under development. It's going to miss a few functions and look a bit ugly for a while, but I'm working on it full time now as the old forum was too unstable. Couple days, all good. If you notice any issues, please contact me.

Forum Index : Electronics : cheap 2A boost dc-dc converters

Author Message
poida

Guru

Joined: 02/02/2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 1387
Posted: 12:33am 23 Oct 2020
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

So I saw on Ali some new (to me) boost converters...
5-32V IN, 5-55V out, 2A for $2.50 US plus $0.68US postage .
they use the XL6009 converter chip.

XL6009-DC-DC-Converter-Datasheet.pdf





So I got a couple and the first thing to do is to test them.
These are promoted to be good for laptop supplies, so I tested at 18V
and 25V output both with 12.7V input. You set the output voltage via a multi turn trimpot.

As supplied

18.0V @ 0Amps
18.2V @ 0.5A load
17.0V @ 1.0A
16.2V @ 1.5A
15.4V @ 2.0A
14.9V @ 2.5A (no smoke)

and at 25V output

25.0V @ 0A
26.7V @ 0.5A
29.0V @ 1.0A
26.3V @ 1.5A
20.2V @ 2.0A

This is crap regulation. I put a probe on the output and here it is
at 1.0A at 25V output.
Yellow is output voltage, AC coupled, 0.5V/div
Light Blue is the switch node showing the boost output pin of the inductor
which clearly shows the switching frequency and gives me something to trigger off.



Not real good. Both samples performed the same.
I thought the output cap was not filtering well enough so I put a bigger
one on it.



and regulation improved somewhat.

18.0V @ 0A
18.0V @ 0.5A
18.0V @ 1.0A
17.9V @ 1.5A
17.4V @ 2.0A

25.0V @ 0A
25.3V @ 0.5A
25.1V @ 1.0A
24.2V @ 1.5A
20.9V @ 2.0A

But still not good enough, really.

here is the output ripple now.



That is a huge change. No wonder voltage regulation was crap with
the original output filter capacitor.


An old and dusty boost converter such as below
does +/- 0.04V regulation at 18V over 0 - 2A and
+/- 0.1V at 25V over 0 - 2A, all with 12.7V input



and a synchronous buck/boost costing a lot more is very good
+/- 0.05V at 18V and +/- 0.02V at 25V.
This converter is efficient. at 25V, 2A out, it's 94%


wronger than a phone book full of wrong phone numbers
 
mikeb

Senior Member

Joined: 10/04/2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 173
Posted: 01:48am 23 Oct 2020
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

Try replacing both caps with low ESR types.
Switching frequency of these types of converters is usually in the 100's of kHz.
There is a reason for the very low cost.

Regards, Mike B.
There are 10 kinds of people in the world.
Those that understand binary and those that don't.
 
poida

Guru

Joined: 02/02/2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 1387
Posted: 02:09am 23 Oct 2020
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

oh, for sure, Mike.
I was wondering what you get for the $ or two.

Looking at for instance the LM2588 converter chip, TI's example
circuit has a 1,000uF on the output, 4x larger and undoubtedly
about 10x better in ESR etc since it's a Nichicon



here is a look at the voltage feedback at pin 3 on the XL6009
at 12.7V in, 25V @1A out.
Purple is feedback voltage, needs to be 1.25V.
I put the White cursor on 1.25V
Yellow is output voltage, AC coupled
Light Blue is switch node.



This is so bad I can't even explain how it works at all.


The point of this post is to show what you can get for the pocket change
when it's made of pure Chinesium. I have no need to make these converters
work for any project. It's something to spend time doing in the lockdown.
wronger than a phone book full of wrong phone numbers
 
Grogster

Admin Group

Joined: 31/12/2012
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 9043
Posted: 05:38am 23 Oct 2020
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

Very useful posts - thanks.

I have never used that particular module, but I have seen them on eBay or AliExpress, and they are only about $2 or so I think, complete with the LED display - something has to give!  

What model Rigol do you have?
I am looking at a couple of models.
Any particular reason you got the one you have?
So many to choose from.....

NONE of those buck/boost or SEPIC modules will ever be able to deliver the current they claim as they are.  They all need a heatsink for the higher output loads.  Generally up to 1A or so, they are OK, but more then that, and they do tend to get really rather hot so need heatsinking I have found.

Unless the load current is sporadic.  I have used LM2596 buck modules without a heatsink for thermal printers that suck 1.5A to 2A when printing, but as that is a low duty-cycle, they happily do those kinds of loads, just not at 100% duty.  

Even when I use those modules, I still tend to add a bit of extra input and output decoupling on the host PCB that carries them for exactly the same reasons as you have stated.

If you have one of the LM2596 buck modules, I would be interested to see what your Rigol makes of the output ripple on those, as I have used a few of those for things, but they seem to work OK.  Quite possibly only cos I add the extra input/output caps.

I wonder how they can even make the CLONES of these for the price they sell them for.   I suspect the chip they are using is either a factory reject(which might explain why the reference/FB(purple) voltage is all over the place), or it is some other copy of something else, labelled as something it is not.
Smoke makes things work. When the smoke gets out, it stops!
 
poida

Guru

Joined: 02/02/2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 1387
Posted: 06:41am 23 Oct 2020
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  Grogster said  Very useful posts - thanks.
questions..

Glad this is of interest.

The scope is a Rigol DS1054Z. I find it more useful than anything I can imagine
for the inverter/charge controller/PS learning. You can still hack them to be
100Mhz and with full memory and extra triggers.
4 channels is a must.
100MHz is enough. No need to go higher since even at 50-100Mhz you need to use
careful probe technique that dispenses with the little alligator clip earth leads.

(I got mine when Rigol released it with a poorly performing PLL that drives the ADC so there was a bucketload of jitter in the displayed traces. This was fixed with a firmware update. About 2014 or something when $1AUD = $1US)

The voltage feedback is connected to the output terminals, then fed into a trimpot.
So Vfb = output x some_factor with zero low pass filtering.
All it needs is an output with far less ripple.
It's likely the output cap is about 2c in cost and so has a huge ESR. I checked it's value at 100Hz with the LCR meter and it's 220uF as marked. At 10kHz it dropped to about 3uF

As far as cheap/dysfunctional clones go, the controller is an XL6009, made in China I think. What is quite possible is the XL6009 spec sheet is just thrown together and the circuits and component values may as well be for a NASA lunar probe PS that uses TI and LT parts. From what I see with the switching and control - when fitted with the extra cap - the chip seems to work well. I think if it's given a low ripple feedback, it will perform much better again.
wronger than a phone book full of wrong phone numbers
 
Warpspeed
Guru

Joined: 09/08/2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 4406
Posted: 02:25pm 23 Oct 2020
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

I also bought a DS1054Z after Peters glowing recommendations.

Best thing I have done in a very long time. Its a truly amazing bit of kit.
Cheers,  Tony.
 
disco4now

Guru

Joined: 18/12/2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 843
Posted: 11:06pm 23 Oct 2020
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

I also have a DS1054Z, a couple of years now. I thought @poida's must have been a much more powerful thing because mine could not do anything like what his was doing. But it is the same and I have learned a lot and managed to reproduce many of the captures shown building the MPPT solar controller.
Gerry
Latest F4 Latest H7
 
Warpspeed
Guru

Joined: 09/08/2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 4406
Posted: 02:01am 24 Oct 2020
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

Yes the DS1054Z has a vast range of features that can be very difficult to learn and use at first.
I think it takes a very long time to get to get the best from it.
But even if most of the features are never exploited to the full, its still a very nice oscilloscope.
Cheers,  Tony.
 
Print this page


To reply to this topic, you need to log in.

© JAQ Software 2024