Home
JAQForum Ver 24.01
Log In or Join  
Active Topics
Local Time 17:59 02 Aug 2025 Privacy Policy
Jump to

Notice. New forum software under development. It's going to miss a few functions and look a bit ugly for a while, but I'm working on it full time now as the old forum was too unstable. Couple days, all good. If you notice any issues, please contact me.

Forum Index : Microcontroller and PC projects : More dangers of A.I.

     Page 2 of 3    
Author Message
Grogster

Admin Group

Joined: 31/12/2012
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 9610
Posted: 10:04am 05 Jul 2019
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  CaptainBoing said  
  Grogster said   It somewhat worries me that this does not seem to be getting hammered into some of the newbies during their training....


quite so and it is in any trade.


I have been talking to NEW sparkies here over the years, and they ALL said there was no shock hazard at all with respect to neutral and earth. This worries me at a fundamental AC power distribution level. They are obviously thinking that AC is DC cos they have some of the same colours. RED is phase in AC or positive in DC. BLACK is neutral in AC or negative in DC. Therefore, black is completely safe to touch(it isn't). See what I mean? (rhetorical)

I have to admit that BOTH of those NEW sparkies gave me a deadpan stare and a blink without saying anything, when I simply stated that if YOU were touching the neutral, and then BREAK that neutral circuit(usually via the neutral loop on the back of most switches with both hands) by pulling the neutral loop apart while loaded....you WILL feel it....

To be fair to both of them, they both admitted that they had never thought of that, and that THIS WAS NEVER MENTIONED during their training. Perhaps it was just the training that THEY attended. I like to think so....
Smoke makes things work. When the smoke gets out, it stops!
 
Tinine
Guru

Joined: 30/03/2016
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1646
Posted: 10:24am 05 Jul 2019
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  Grogster said  
  CaptainBoing said  
  Grogster said   It somewhat worries me that this does not seem to be getting hammered into some of the newbies during their training....


quite so and it is in any trade.


I have been talking to NEW sparkies here over the years, and they ALL said there was no shock hazard at all with respect to neutral and earth. This worries me at a fundamental AC power distribution level. They are obviously thinking that AC is DC cos they have some of the same colours. RED is phase in AC or positive in DC. BLACK is neutral in AC or negative in DC. Therefore, black is completely safe to touch(it isn't). See what I mean? (rhetorical)

I have to admit that BOTH of those NEW sparkies gave me a deadpan stare and a blink without saying anything, when I simply stated that if YOU were touching the neutral, and then BREAK that neutral circuit(usually via the neutral loop on the back of most switches with both hands) by pulling the neutral loop apart while loaded....you WILL feel it....

To be fair to both of them, they both admitted that they had never thought of that, and that THIS WAS NEVER MENTIONED during their training. Perhaps it was just the training that THEY attended. I like to think so....


It seems that most sparkies get through training and that's the end of it...it's just a way to earn a wage. I was at an electrical distributorship and the owner of a local electrical contracting company came in asked for "some 100 amp wire"...
 
Volhout
Guru

Joined: 05/03/2018
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 5091
Posted: 02:38pm 05 Jul 2019
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

I am lost .... what is the connection with artificial intelligence...
Guess that's purely artificial...
PicomiteVGA PETSCII ROBOTS
 
Tinine
Guru

Joined: 30/03/2016
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1646
Posted: 03:15pm 05 Jul 2019
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  Volhout said   I am lost .... what is the connection with artificial intelligence...
Guess that's purely artificial...


The opposite; genuine stupidity
 
Grogster

Admin Group

Joined: 31/12/2012
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 9610
Posted: 11:51pm 05 Jul 2019
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

Sorry, Volhout.

The topic of this thread has deviated a bit. I'll try to get back on track with the A.I again now.
Smoke makes things work. When the smoke gets out, it stops!
 
BrianP
Senior Member

Joined: 30/03/2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 292
Posted: 01:06am 06 Jul 2019
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

Does "Artificial" Intelligence mean that it's not REAL intelligence after all?
 
Malibu
Senior Member

Joined: 07/07/2018
Location: Australia
Posts: 260
Posted: 05:30am 06 Jul 2019
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

To get back on track, I'll ask the question - The topic of the thread is the 'dangers of'... but what are peoples thoughts on AI?

Excluding the movies, AI is coming in more and more and I'm guessing we're stuck with it now.
I for one am not really too confident with driverless cars, but love the technology behind it (hey, do we really need NO driver in a car?). To me, it's pointless and probably bad.
Then again, there's drone trials in Africa (errrr.. I think it's there, but could be wrong) delivering medical supplies with no human input aside from the initial delivery instructions. Probably good and I'm all for it.
... Then again, do I really need my pizza delivered by a drone?

The fascinating one for me that is really scary when you think about it is this type of technology
Atlas Robot by Boston Dynamics
amongst others that they do... hmmm... serious techno, but where's it going? (Go watch Terminator again!)
John
 
isochronic
Guru

Joined: 21/01/2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 689
Posted: 02:15pm 06 Jul 2019
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post


Hopefully it will drown in its own Sargasso Sea of dud information.
Ask Siri to call Alexa. In fact ask Siri "What did the fox say ?"
 
Tinine
Guru

Joined: 30/03/2016
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1646
Posted: 03:05pm 06 Jul 2019
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

Just more fodder for the scare mongers.

When I was a kid, it was the Soviets, then we get fake terrorism and man-made climate change....there always has to be a boogeyman to keep us afraid.
 
Tinine
Guru

Joined: 30/03/2016
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1646
Posted: 05:15pm 06 Jul 2019
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

Driverless cars:
Seat belts have been mandatory for many years but back in 2005, I'm absolutely certain that my car's radar saved my life. Why isn't this mandatory? Could it be that they are more concerned with saving a life than preventing the collision that would negatively impact car sales?
 
lizby
Guru

Joined: 17/05/2016
Location: United States
Posts: 3378
Posted: 05:53pm 06 Jul 2019
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  Malibu said  hey, do we really need NO driver in a car?

I expect to need it, and the need could happen quite abruptly. In many places, uber or lyft would do as well, and less expensively, but I expect they won't reach the remote-ish village I live in for half the year for quite a while. And I'd be quite happy to let an automaton handle the 3,300km drive I do twice a year. (Flying would work quite well if we could travel with less gear.)

  Malibu said  do I really need my pizza delivered by a drone?

This isn't going to be governed by +my+ need, but by the need of the pizza place to deliver more cheaply than the next guy. And so for all non-private transportation unless there are job-saving regulations (known in the past for the railroads as "featherbedding").

  Malibu said  The fascinating one for me that is really scary when you think about it is this type of technology

Lots of scary stuff when you consider that an AI smarter and more capable than we are could well decide that it, and most other species (excepting those we favor, like cows, chickens, pigs, corn, wheat, etc.), would be better off without us (especially if we are in control of its OFF switch).

Edited by lizby 2019-07-08
PicoMite, Armmite F4, SensorKits, MMBasic Hardware, Games, etc. on fruitoftheshed
 
domwild
Guru

Joined: 16/12/2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 873
Posted: 11:20pm 06 Jul 2019
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  isochronic said  
I don't know the details, but there was report that the trading algorithms used to trade shares etc had learnt to exploit the relative slowness of human-processed transactions for advantage.



The slowness has been fixed without AI by laying fibre optics to get access to trades a few nanoseconds prior.
Taxation as a means of achieving prosperity is like a man standing inside a bucket trying to lift himself up.

Winston Churchill
 
BrianP
Senior Member

Joined: 30/03/2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 292
Posted: 12:36am 07 Jul 2019
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

Regarding drones:

With the escalating usage of drones I predict the introduction of mandatory use of on-board anti-collison technology. I for one don't fancy being dumped on by 2 pranging drones complete with payloads (but maybe I'll score a nice pizza ).

What a fertile environment for drone hacking & diversion of the payload to me
Looks like a whole new industry is about to be born...

Just sayin'

B
 
Warpspeed
Guru

Joined: 09/08/2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 4406
Posted: 12:58am 07 Jul 2019
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

What worries me is the increasing use of drive/fly by wire systems where the human driver/pilot has no direct physical control of a system that can lead to a very fatal crash.

While such systems can and will be designed to have self checking and redundant systems, that cannot guarantee that someone has not deliberately hacked into the the system, and you would never know until its too late.

And its not just the crazies. Governments are now doing this as a matter of policy, deliberately building back doors into things.


Cheers,  Tony.
 
StoveMan
Regular Member

Joined: 29/03/2013
Location: United States
Posts: 51
Posted: 03:40am 07 Jul 2019
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

AI hmm. Doesn't worry me at all. Movies aside an insect demonstrates more intelligence than the best current tech. Not only can they wobble awkwardly through the snow and avoid obstacles. Their software allows simultaneous processing of energy procurement, threat detection and avoidance, environmental modification to improve survivability, and software and hardware replication.
If theoretically a machine became self aware I wonder if it would then share the same limitations that some say so handicap humans. would crisp decision-making be slowed down by self-doubt, self-esteem, embarrassment, ego, etc. Self aware by definition involves more than recognizing you are an individual, all animals seen to perceive this and no one seems worried they will take over the world, but an awareness of how one is perceived by others. It is this aspect of self awareness that gives rise to cooperation and morality. Why do we keep thinking that true intelligence can be separated from , well... true intelligence? Because it is a machine which is intelligent why does it have to decide like a machine?

Now there are undoubtedly better programmers out there than me, an maybe they can chime in, but I've played with fuzzy logic and pseudo learning algorithms enough to know that state table are state tables and data sets are data sets. You can program probability, statistical analysis, and heuristic branches and make some cool simulations of intelligence but we are talking about exhibited behavior which not only surprises but surpasses input.

Who said that "to the uneducated anything is possible"?
I have to smile thinking of an AI stressing about his book report presentation.

A ramble to be sure....
 
Boppa
Guru

Joined: 08/11/2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 814
Posted: 04:45am 07 Jul 2019
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  Warpspeed said   What worries me is the increasing use of drive/fly by wire systems where the human driver/pilot has no direct physical control of a system that can lead to a very fatal crash.

While such systems can and will be designed to have self checking and redundant systems, that cannot guarantee that someone has not deliberately hacked into the the system, and you would never know until its too late.

And its not just the crazies. Governments are now doing this as a matter of policy, deliberately building back doors into things.


The Tesla autodrive system has already been 'hacked' (well it was being fed incorrect info, rather than a software hack, but...)

(apparently if you use a certain liquid/paint on the road, it fools the computer into following the 'fake line')
 
BrianP
Senior Member

Joined: 30/03/2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 292
Posted: 06:41am 07 Jul 2019
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

F.W.I.W.

AI-designed heat pumps consume less energy Sat, 06 Jul 2019 12:35:04 EDT
Researchers have developed a method that uses artificial intelligence to design next-generation heat-pump compressors. Their method can cut the pumps' power requirement by around 25%.
 
Tinine
Guru

Joined: 30/03/2016
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1646
Posted: 09:25am 07 Jul 2019
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  BrianP said   F.W.I.W.

AI-designed heat pumps consume less energy Sat, 06 Jul 2019 12:35:04 EDT
Researchers have developed a method that uses artificial intelligence to design next-generation heat-pump compressors. Their method can cut the pumps' power requirement by around 25%.


Cool, but I think they have some catching up to do. If the A.I. system is already programmed to accept that the first law of thermodynamics is true....it won't get as far as it could.

I, for one believe it to be false and I can't accept that since Faraday came with electrolysis, back in the 1800s that we simply accept that splitting water requires more energy than hydrogen can provide. 1833, I believe....and that's it????

No...WAY! High voltages at certain frequencies and virtually no current (no power) can achieve the same thing.
 
Paul_L
Guru

Joined: 03/03/2016
Location: United States
Posts: 769
Posted: 10:33am 07 Jul 2019
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  BrianP said   F.W.I.W.

AI-designed heat pumps consume less energy Sat, 06 Jul 2019 12:35:04 EDT
Researchers have developed a method that uses artificial intelligence to design next-generation heat-pump compressors. Their method can cut the pumps' power requirement by around 25%.

NICE FIND BRIAN!!!!

This significant work was completed this year at the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne by two PhD students, Violette Mounier and Cyril Picard. After several years of effort they were able to produce significant increases in efficiency by replacing piston compressors, which waste a lot of energy due to the friction generated by the pistons sliding up and down in the cylinders, with turbo compressors using gas lubrication in the rotating bearings.

It's too bad that they didn't compare their turbo compressors to the orbiting scroll compressor produced by the Copeland subsidiary of Emerson Electric. This ingenious gadget reduces the sliding friction energy loss to a small fraction of that produced by piston compressors. It's been in production since about 1965 and it's used in virtually all U.S. manufactured heat pumps.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsabYhhOko0

The ground source heat pump operating in my house since 2012 pumps about 64,000 BTU/hour (19050 watts/hour) of heat with an power consumption of about 5,500 watthours per hour. In other words it produces about 3.46 times as much heat as resistance heaters would produce.

Part of this very high efficiency is due to the fact that I move the heat around by pumping water at low velocities through large diameter HDPE pipes which uses about 15% of the power needed to transport the heat by blowing air through ducts.

Turbocompressors like the ones employed in this paper will produce some additional efficiency improvements but they will cost more than five times as much as the Copeland Scroll compressor to manufacture. Similar turbocompressors have been powering the climate control systems on most commercial aircraft since the 707 was introduced in 1958 and they are very expensive to manufacture.

The big advantage of heat pumps comes from the fact that there is no attempt to convert either electrical energy or potential energy bound up in hydrocarbon compounds to heat, the gadget merely concentrates diffuse heat found in the outside air or the deep ground into more concentrated heat at a higher temperature and moves it into the building. All of the laws of thermodynamics are therefore bypassed.

Paul in NY.Edited by Paul_L 2019-07-08
 
Tinine
Guru

Joined: 30/03/2016
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1646
Posted: 11:50am 07 Jul 2019
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

Ever checked-out cavitation?


https://youtu.be/t98UBY3GhhI
 
     Page 2 of 3    
Print this page
The Back Shed's forum code is written, and hosted, in Australia.
© JAQ Software 2025