![]() |
Forum Index : Microcontroller and PC projects : Raspberry Pi Pico W
![]() ![]() |
|||||
Author | Message | ||||
Mixtel90![]() Guru ![]() Joined: 05/10/2019 Location: United KingdomPosts: 7937 |
I'm sure that all the things that your tablet connects to over bluetooth contain a CPU, RAM etc. to handle the protocols. I don't know, but I doubt if the bluetooth chips themselves handle everything. Mick Zilog Inside! nascom.info for Nascom & Gemini Preliminary MMBasic docs & my PCB designs |
||||
Tinine Guru ![]() Joined: 30/03/2016 Location: United KingdomPosts: 1646 |
You can simply grab 2 HC-05s, plug them into separate Mites, pair them and begin communicating....exactly as if they were wired. SPP's very purpose is to replace serial wiring. You can also get RS232-BT units that will directly replace a 232 cable. Craig |
||||
Mixtel90![]() Guru ![]() Joined: 05/10/2019 Location: United KingdomPosts: 7937 |
Oh yeah, but that doesn't relate to the Pi Pico W - which *may* not have enough processing power in the usual RP2040 arrangement to run bluetooth properly. The HC-05 is an intelligent device in its own right. Mick Zilog Inside! nascom.info for Nascom & Gemini Preliminary MMBasic docs & my PCB designs |
||||
JohnS Guru ![]() Joined: 18/11/2011 Location: United KingdomPosts: 4044 |
This article says "Probably due to a lack of pins on the RP2040, the Bluetooth interface is not connected at all. Maybe a future version of the Pico will share some GPIO pins with the Bluetooth module?" John |
||||
pwillard Guru ![]() Joined: 07/06/2022 Location: United StatesPosts: 313 |
I'm not going to be upset about missing Bluetooth... I wanted wifi and they managed it. |
||||
led-bloon![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 21/12/2014 Location: AustraliaPosts: 207 |
https://forums.raspberrypi.com/viewtopic.php?t=336764&start=50 (about 2/3 way down post from allan Raspberry Pi Documentation dude) I read it all as... Python will have 2 uf2 files - one for with and one for without wireless. For systems built with 'c' there will just be libraries in the sdk that can be included as required. led Edited 2022-07-01 21:21 by led-bloon Miss you George |
||||
matherp Guru ![]() Joined: 11/12/2012 Location: United KingdomPosts: 10315 |
This article says They should check their facts before pontificating aallan: Raspberry Pi Trading Employee & Forum Moderator |
||||
Grogster![]() Admin Group ![]() Joined: 31/12/2012 Location: New ZealandPosts: 9610 |
(bottom of page that LED-BLOON linked to in his post) So, they ARE working on it as I expected, but I guess there might be a bit of work in it, so they just release a uf2 file with the WiFi support first so people can play with the latest model. ![]() Smoke makes things work. When the smoke gets out, it stops! |
||||
pwillard Guru ![]() Joined: 07/06/2022 Location: United StatesPosts: 313 |
I did notice that it changes how the onboard LED works. It's now driven by the WIFI chip. |
||||
Mixtel90![]() Guru ![]() Joined: 05/10/2019 Location: United KingdomPosts: 7937 |
That's because they needed the pin for something else. You don't get owt for nowt and adding a Wi-Fi chip to a RP2040 means that you will lose some I/O etc. Mick Zilog Inside! nascom.info for Nascom & Gemini Preliminary MMBasic docs & my PCB designs |
||||
pwillard Guru ![]() Joined: 07/06/2022 Location: United StatesPosts: 313 |
Well, it seems like it was in the plans since the pin GAP *between* GP22-GP26 now goes to the WIFI chip instead of being unavailable. Edited 2022-07-02 23:42 by pwillard |
||||
led-bloon![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 21/12/2014 Location: AustraliaPosts: 207 |
For anyone interested in some technical insight into the WiFi/Bluetooth side of things: RaspberryPi Forum Block diagram led Edit: Fixed forum link Edited 2022-07-04 14:25 by led-bloon Miss you George |
||||
Mixtel90![]() Guru ![]() Joined: 05/10/2019 Location: United KingdomPosts: 7937 |
Inspired by the forum link: I dunno... As soon as someone brings along something nice someone else wants to break it. :( Mick Zilog Inside! nascom.info for Nascom & Gemini Preliminary MMBasic docs & my PCB designs |
||||
BishopXXL Newbie ![]() Joined: 13/01/2019 Location: GermanyPosts: 34 |
Hi, Found this, on URL https://forums.raspberrypi.com/viewtopic.php?t=336824 but soundīs BAD.......... Re: Register level documentation for CYW43439 Quote Sat Jul 02, 2022 2:48 pm I'm the author of the Zerowi project (https://iosoft.blog/zerowi/), which aimed to provide a bare-metal driver for the CYW43438 on the Pi zero, but discontinued the development because no-one (including myself) seemed to have much enthusiasm for achieving that end-result. In theory the CYW43439 should be similar, so I'm currently porting the code to the Pico-W; not sure if it will be a worthwhile exercise, but at least it'll be a good way of understanding the simple hardware (but remarkably complicated software) interface between the Wifi processor and the RP2040. I'll be putting the end-result on the Iosoft blog. With regard to getting detailed information on the WiFi chip internals, I think there is no chance, unless you sign an NDA and buy a million chips, but I'd be very happy to be proved wrong. |
||||
Mixtel90![]() Guru ![]() Joined: 05/10/2019 Location: United KingdomPosts: 7937 |
It's not a problem unless you want to modify the firmware on the chip. It's not intended that you should be able to do that and it won't have any effect on what Raspberry Pi are doing (or are intending to do) with it. In fact it will probably break the chip as far as the Raspberry Pi firmware is concerned. Mick Zilog Inside! nascom.info for Nascom & Gemini Preliminary MMBasic docs & my PCB designs |
||||
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Back Shed's forum code is written, and hosted, in Australia. | © JAQ Software 2025 |