Notice. New forum software under development. It's going to miss a few functions and look a bit ugly for a while, but I'm working on it full time now as the old forum was too unstable. Couple days, all good. If you notice any issues, please contact me.
flc1 Senior Member Joined: 20/11/2011 Location: New ZealandPosts: 242
Posted: 08:55pm 02 Jan 2017
Copy link to clipboard
Print this post
Phill, Where have I written flack about your blades??? nowhere, not on youtube, I said the diffrent outputs have nothing to do with blades,and that is correct. I have simply stated what I saw with your youtube vid, an observation of the output of both turbines at same rpm,IM NOT TALKING ABOUT YOUR BLADES Phill, , they are as you say a proven design, thats why we ordered some. Fred
DaveP68 Senior Member Joined: 25/11/2014 Location: New ZealandPosts: 292
Posted: 09:04pm 02 Jan 2017
Copy link to clipboard
Print this post
Hi Phill
I fully except your detailed description of your full setup, which goes a long way to explain our observations of what has been seen in the YouTube video.
This sort of thing goes both ways, so please give that one some deeper thought for future reference.
Lets leave it there, like you say.
DavidEdited by DaveP68 2017-01-04There are realities if you do not accept, will lead to frustration because you will be spending time on wrong assumptions and the results cannot follow! The Dunning Kruger Effect :)
Same Chinese turbine operating in the South-East of Romania for a few months now.
1.5 kw nominal power. I had to make the tail boom longer (about 50-60 cm longer) and I increased the surface of the tail vane in order to make it more stable and now produces over 2 kw of power in high winds: