Home
JAQForum Ver 24.01
Log In or Join  
Active Topics
Local Time 10:57 01 Aug 2025 Privacy Policy
Jump to

Notice. New forum software under development. It's going to miss a few functions and look a bit ugly for a while, but I'm working on it full time now as the old forum was too unstable. Couple days, all good. If you notice any issues, please contact me.

Forum Index : Microcontroller and PC projects : It’s and ARDUINO - NOT!!

Author Message
Volhout
Guru

Joined: 05/03/2018
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 5089
Posted: 09:24am 29 May 2018
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post




It's and ARDUINO ...... UNO at first sight




Oh wait ... it is infected by a bug ????
NO, it is an MX170

Arduino running MMbasic !!


PicomiteVGA PETSCII ROBOTS
 
Grogster

Admin Group

Joined: 31/12/2012
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 9610
Posted: 11:01am 29 May 2018
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

Can you elaborate on this a little more?

Are you saying you have MMBASIC running on an Arduino?
Smoke makes things work. When the smoke gets out, it stops!
 
CaptainBoing

Guru

Joined: 07/09/2016
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2170
Posted: 11:54am 29 May 2018
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  Grogster said   Can you elaborate on this a little more?


I suspect it's a "brain-transplant". The arduino been removed from the board and a MX170 soldered to the I/O pins so it fits the footprint and maybe takes advantage of the USB interface for the console. Nice idea.

I have toyed in the past with the idea of producing a MM board on the same footprint (shield) outline, but never needed to. Have used arduino shield boards but only singly and was ok with 0.1" rows of connectors.

One of my first forays into MM-beyond-the-breadboard was to do a brain-transplant of a PIC16F877 with a MX170 44-pin version mounted on a daughter board with the pins taken to two rows of 20x0.1" headers on 0.6" centers (i.e. the footprint of a 40pin DIP)... bit of programming and job done - still running today in my frequency counter.

Edited by CaptainBoing 2018-05-30
 
Grogster

Admin Group

Joined: 31/12/2012
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 9610
Posted: 12:12pm 29 May 2018
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

Ahhhhhh - gotcha, thanks.
Smoke makes things work. When the smoke gets out, it stops!
 
Volhout
Guru

Joined: 05/03/2018
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 5089
Posted: 01:01pm 29 May 2018
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

It simply rewired the removed ATMEGA28 to the PIC170MX running Micromite basic 5.04.09.

Rewired the pins such that PWM pins end up dat PWM pins, I2C at I2C, Analog at analog, SPI at SPI. (some sacrifices have to be made... only 4 analog pins and 4 PWM pins versus 6 of each in Arduino).

But in general most Arduino shields should work 1:1.
The 3.3V regulator is also on the board and a resistor network for the RESET (5V->3.3V) so it is a direct plug-in for the ATMEG328P.

I had Tinybasic running on the Arduino, but became tired of fixing bugs in Tinybasic, and adding features to it, in this minimal RAM space. Decided to replace the hardware....

Geoff and others have done a great job in creating MMbasic. I know from Tinybasic how hard it is (and I even leapfrogged on earlier work).


PicomiteVGA PETSCII ROBOTS
 
Volhout
Guru

Joined: 05/03/2018
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 5089
Posted: 01:07pm 29 May 2018
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

But in hindsight, it is not a bad idea. The UNO costs something like 6 dollar shipped, the PIC costs 4-5 dollar, so for 11-12 dollar you have a more powerfull platform including USB UART, voltage regulators, reset circuit, headers. Cheaper than the (more powerfull) CircuitGizmo's Arduino outline micromite platform (29.99 dollar ex shipping...and TAX**)..



** I ordered a CGCOLORMAX2 from them, and got a bill from our dutch government that I should pay additional 26 euro's (some 35 dollar) TAX on it. They even taxed the shipping cost. And no way to get past that, they would simply not give you the colormax. That was a bummer...
Edited by Volhout 2018-05-31
PicomiteVGA PETSCII ROBOTS
 
CircuitGizmos

Guru

Joined: 08/09/2011
Location: United States
Posts: 1427
Posted: 08:36pm 29 May 2018
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  Volhout said   ** I ordered a CGCOLORMAX2 from them, and got a bill from our dutch government that I should pay additional 26 euro's (some 35 dollar) TAX on it. They even taxed the shipping cost. And no way to get past that, they would simply not give you the colormax. That was a bummer...


You pay that much import tax? Ouch.


There is also the CGMICROKIT-Micromite-Kit



and CGMICROKIT-Micromite-Kit-Board-only



Micromites and Maximites! - Beginning Maximite
 
MicroBlocks

Guru

Joined: 12/05/2012
Location: Thailand
Posts: 2209
Posted: 02:35am 30 May 2018
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  Volhout said   But in hindsight, it is not a bad idea. The UNO costs something like 6 dollar shipped, the PIC costs 4-5 dollar, so for 11-12 dollar you have a more powerfull platform including USB UART, voltage regulators, reset circuit, headers. Cheaper than the (more powerfull) CircuitGizmo's Arduino outline micromite platform (29.99 dollar ex shipping...and TAX**)..



** I ordered a CGCOLORMAX2 from them, and got a bill from our dutch government that I should pay additional 26 euro's (some 35 dollar) TAX on it. They even taxed the shipping cost. And no way to get past that, they would simply not give you the colormax. That was a bummer...


You taxes should only consist of VAT (BTW in Nederland)

There is no import duty for goods costing lower then 150 euro.
The Dutch government thus charges you about 6-7 euro.

The rest you paid are handling costs (inklarings kosten) by the transport company. These vary a lot and should for small packages be free.

I got some conflicts before about those costs, and I just told them I did not accept the cost and refused the package. They would then have to return it to sender which is a large cost to them. If it is the likes of DHL or Fedex then they really do not like it and in my case they waved their handling costs. This obviously will not work all the time, but sometimes you have to set a limit.

Now i live in Thailand and again DHL and Fedex charge redicoulous amounts of costs.
These are mostly made up costs as there is no special handling at all.
From the USA USPS is best as they are part of the worldwide postal system. When the package arrives local postal services do the delivery.




Microblocks. Build with logic.
 
lizby
Guru

Joined: 17/05/2016
Location: United States
Posts: 3378
Posted: 12:05pm 30 May 2018
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  MicroBlocks said  ... DHL and Fedex charge redicoulous amounts ... From the USA USPS is best as they are part of the worldwide postal system. When the package arrives local postal services do the delivery.


Same in Canada. DHL & Fedex charge "import fees" which may be $25 or more. No charge with USPS and it may be more convenient since they will leave it in your post office box instead of leaving a slip if you're not there to come to the door.

PicoMite, Armmite F4, SensorKits, MMBasic Hardware, Games, etc. on fruitoftheshed
 
MicroBlocks

Guru

Joined: 12/05/2012
Location: Thailand
Posts: 2209
Posted: 12:34pm 30 May 2018
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

From Thailand the shipping fees are still ok. I would not want to have a business in the USA and have international customers. Luckily for them the internal market is probably big enough.
For internatiol shipping it many times does not really work as the shipping costs are often higher then the product. And ordering more then you need is also not a good thing.

The guys in China though, they have it easy as the Chinese governments subsidizes the transport costs by keeping their postal tariffs very low. so many suppliers in China/Hongkong have free shipping even on cheap parts.
It should not be like that as there is no level playing field, but it is what it is.

Microblocks. Build with logic.
 
isochronic
Guru

Joined: 21/01/2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 689
Posted: 04:03am 02 Jun 2018
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

From July 1, suppliers to Aus will have to charge GST, ie the $1000 minimum
no longer applies. Go figure...the paperwork alone will cost more to Aus than it brings in.
[Then again in Aus the so-called "level playing field" seems to be more bonus-managed abandoned quarry ]
 
TassyJim

Guru

Joined: 07/08/2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 6283
Posted: 06:10am 02 Jun 2018
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  chronic said   From July 1, suppliers to Aus will have to charge GST, ie the $1000 minimum no longer applies. Go figure...the paperwork alone will cost more to Aus than it brings in.

Only if they supply over $75,000 worth of goods per year. (That's my reading of it but I am no tax expert).

From the ATO website
  Quote  You must register for GST in Australia if:

you carry on an enterprise
your GST turnover from sales that are connected with Australia and made in the course of your enterprise, meets or exceeds the registration turnover threshold of A$75,000 (or A$150,000, if you are a non-profit body)

If you are an electronic distribution platform operator or re-deliverer and are responsible for GST on a sale, that sale is treated as being made by you instead of the merchant. These sales will be counted towards your GST turnover, instead of the merchant's GST turnover.

This means that if the value of your sales of low value goods imported into Australia by consumers (plus any other sales you make that are connected with Australia) is A$75,000 or more in a 12-month period, you need to register for GST.

You do not count sales towards your GST turnover if they are not connected with Australia. This includes sales that GST does not apply to under the new law because the purchaser is not a consumer or because the goods are not low value goods.

If the customer pays a price including shipping, this will typically form part of the price when you are calculating the GST on the sale. Therefore, generally you should include shipping costs in the value of your sales when you are considering if you reach the GST turnover threshold.


Jim
VK7JH
MMedit
 
isochronic
Guru

Joined: 21/01/2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 689
Posted: 07:57am 02 Jun 2018
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

It seems to disadvantage USA tech companies - who suffer a high $ exchange rate, and bear also the expense of developing the tech in the first place - and assist cheap ripoffs from the third world.Edited by chronic 2018-06-03
 
Paul_L
Guru

Joined: 03/03/2016
Location: United States
Posts: 769
Posted: 09:04pm 02 Jun 2018
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

Hey Stuart, no fair, Trump impersonations don't work well with an Aussie accent!

Paul in NY
 
isochronic
Guru

Joined: 21/01/2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 689
Posted: 04:54am 03 Jun 2018
Copy link to clipboard 
Print this post

  Quote  accent!

tch, tch, tch.. (skippy noise )

Seriously though it pisses me off. The impetus was from major domestic retail chains - often selling stuff that is dated technology and overpriced because of "added service" (?), who generally don't sell hi tech anyway.

The upshot for Aus users, is buying pics/atmels/most ICs/pickit4 etc from the US will cop the GST.

I think there should be a exception for R&D tech components, so cutting edge/disruptive tech development and transfer is not disadvantaged.
 
Print this page


To reply to this topic, you need to log in.

The Back Shed's forum code is written, and hosted, in Australia.
© JAQ Software 2025